
The second part of the Washington Post articles on contractors and intelligence occurred today. A good bit centered around the way that contractors cost more than government workers.
There wasn't much argument against this 'cost' factor.....which I found kind of funny.
The government gets stuck into this corner because they see a necessity to do something with a deadline involved....and once you start thinking this way....your operation is screwed if it's 100 percent government worker.
An example. When Larry, your government worker leaves....you quickly move to get a replacement. There's an ad, resumes are sent in, and this long process starts up. From the closure of the ad....until the new guy arrives....it could well be twenty to twenty-four weeks. If there are screw-ups or problems....add another sixteen weeks....maybe even twenty-four more weeks.
In my government agency....we advertise these government jobs. When the job closes.....there's this typical four-week period where the HR filtering system goes into effect and eventually dumps the folks felt qualified. We had a case recently where three resumes were handed. I think our guys were hoping for at least ten to fifteen. As our guys read the three resumes....none really showed any potential. So we re-advertised.
The second time around....there were more choices but then we ran into a funny episode. The number one pick said "sure"....but he wanted to enter NOT at step one of the grade offered.....but like step three (a $6k difference). This took up another week as we finally declined him and moved to candidate number two....who repeated the same game. Finally candidate number three ended up agreeing to step one and we closed this somewhere around week 37. Contractors would have taken six weeks max....from closure of the ad....to the guy arriving.
There's this other problem involved in the game as well. Clearances. In a lot of cases, the government is willing to hire the guy and wait four to eight months for him to get a clearance. This means that Larry arrives and just sits around....collecting checks....and doing nothing as we wait for his security clearance. The contractor team? Well....they hire the right guy with the clearance ready to go. They don't wait.
Then you have this odd plus-up with contractors. If you have a project which has taken off and suddenly is important....you can turn to a contractor team and say that you need 100 intelligence support folks in three months for a major project. You write the preferences of the 100 positions, and then the contractor goes out to hire.
If these were government positions....by the time you figure the fight with the local HR folks, and the various forms of paperwork involved....then you've got around eight to twelve months involved in the process. The contractor team beats that every time.
The Post fails to ever consider retirement costs in any of their article....which I found interesting as well. The typical contractor company? They offer up a 401k deal....and that's it. You get three bucks for each three you contribute, and that's the end of the retirement deal. You invest for your own future.
The government? Well...first, there's the retirement pay at the end of your career, which could add up to $60k a year if you keep making the steps at the right time. It could even go beyond the $60k. A regular clerk for thirty-five years....could easily walk away with $30k. Then you have TSP.....the 401k government plan....where they match your funds just like the company does. So they are paying more long after you are gone.
The need for computer experts that the Post mentions? Yeah....the government is massively entrenched into bigger and better hardware and software. Frankly....they can't maintain an edge....without paying for the expertise. But go over to Sears, or Vanguard, or Google. They are in the same boat and hire the same kind of help.
My feeling over what the Post is aiming at for an agenda? Probably another OMB organization that functions like a hiring post similar to what the government workers have. This massive apparatus is what makes government employment comical....being applied against contractors? The aim is a bunch of bureaucrat guys running the doors to the contractor kingdom? You just crossed off half of the advantage of using contractors.
So far, the journalism factor of these two articles isn't exactly surging toward that Pulitzer Prize....if you ask me.